Why 26 GHz Wi-Fi breaches EMF safety limits — and how 5G beam scheduling keeps radiation in check
The 26 GHz millimeter-wave band was meant to power India’s 5G revolution — not Wi-Fi. So why are operators seeking to repurpose it?
In this video, I break down how 26 GHz Wi-Fi creates EMF compliance risks that 5G avoids through beam scheduling and duty-cycle control. Using simple simulations, I explain what EIRP, power density, and safe distance mean — and why, without dynamic beam management, 26 GHz Wi-Fi can either breach TEC’s 5 W/m² limit or waste valuable spectrum with limited range.
📊 Download the slides used in this video here:
👉 [Download Slides – PDF]
🔍 Key Takeaways
- Why 26 GHz is technically challenging for Wi-Fi but manageable for 5G
- How beam scheduling and duty cycle reduce EMF exposure
- The trade-off between EIRP power and coverage distance
- Why tower co-location tightens EMF limits instead of relaxing them
- Why Wi-Fi specifications in 26 GHz must align with 3GPP beam-management standards
🎥 Watch related videos:
- Hindi Version
- How 26 GHz Became a Goldmine: SUC Loophole, FWA Potential & Regulatory Jackpot
- Jio Wants Wi-Fi on 5G Spectrum? Exposing the 26 GHz vs 6 GHz Hypocrisy
⚠️ Disclaimer: This video and analysis are for educational and public-interest discussion. They do not constitute medical or regulatory advice.